As a kid, I used to watch movies like Goodfellas and The Sopranos. The truck robberies always stood out. The idea of pulling over an 80,000 pound truck in broad daylight, forcing the driver out, and taking the load felt extreme. It did not seem real. It felt like something that only happened in movies. Back then, organized crime looked bold and visible, something you could see unfolding in front of you.
Fast forward to 2026, and we are seeing major US brands hit in real life. Truckloads of lobster from Costco, shipments of Guy Furi Santo Tequila, and a truckload of nicotine pouches tied to Tucker Carlson. Different products, same outcome. The freight is gone, but it no longer looks like a robbery. There is no dramatic moment, no clear signal, and no obvious break in the process. It happens quietly, inside the normal flow of how freight is moved every day.
This is not a robbery anymore
Today, the theft often begins before the truck even moves. Company details and systems are used so the pickup or redirection looks like just another load. The documents match, the communication lines up, and nothing stands out. The issue is only recognized after the freight fails to arrive, and by then it has already moved through multiple hands.
The scale shows how widespread this has become. In the United States alone, losses are estimated up to $35 billion each year. These are not isolated incidents tied to one commodity or one region. They show up across the market, affecting different types of freight and different types of companies, all following a similar structure.
The same pattern is now visible outside the US. In the UK, a truck carrying 35,000 pints of Guinness is taken from a logistics hub, and nearly 1,000 wheels of cheese are stolen through a coordinated setup. These events are built around timing, location, and how freight is handled at each step in the process.
Across Europe, the KitKat case shows how this extends across borders. A truck carrying over 400,000 KitKat bars is taken while moving from Italy to Poland. The shipment crosses multiple regions before disappearing into secondary channels, making recovery difficult once control has shifted.
Different countries, same playbook
When you look at these cases together, the connection becomes clear. Different regions of the world, different products, but the same structure behind it. The approach may vary depending on the environment, but the outcome remains consistent. Control changes hands early, and everything that follows happens quickly.
Once the freight is taken, it does not sit. It is broken down, resold, or redistributed through existing channels that already move product every day. Those channels are built for speed and volume, not for verifying origin, which allows the freight to continue moving without interruption.
The supply chain was designed to keep goods moving across multiple parties, systems, and locations. That design works as intended, but it also creates points where control is assumed rather than confirmed. That assumption is where the exposure exists, and it is the same across the US, the UK, and Europe.
This is not about lobster, tequila, or chocolate. It is about how easily organized crime can step in, take control, and move freight through a global system that does not stop to ask questions.
The post This isn’t a stickup. It’s a system appeared first on FreightWaves.
